Array Stack vs Linked List Stack in .NET: Which Should You Use?

💡 Concept Name

Stack Implementation: Array vs Linked List

📘 Quick Intro

A stack can be built with either an array or a linked list. Both follow Last-In-First-Out (LIFO), but their internal structure, scalability, and performance can feel very different—especially as your app grows. Let’s see what really happens under the hood.

🧠 Analogy / Short Story

Think of stacking plates at a buffet. If you use an array, it’s like a fixed-size shelf—once the shelf is full, you can't add more unless you replace the shelf with a bigger one. With a linked list, it’s like stacking plates freely on a table: you can keep going as long as you have plates and space, but each plate needs a little name tag (pointer), so it’s a bit more effort per plate.

🔧 Technical Explanation

  • 📦 Array Stack: Stores elements in a continuous memory block. Super-fast and cache-friendly, but must set a size ahead of time or handle resizing manually.
  • 🔗 Linked List Stack: Each item is a node pointing to the next. Grows naturally, never runs out of space unless memory does, but uses extra memory for links (pointers).
  • ⏱️ Both allow O(1) push and pop, but array-based stacks may occasionally pause to resize (usually by doubling size).
  • 🔄 Linked lists shine when you need unlimited growth or lots of insertions/removals, but can be slower due to non-contiguous memory.
  • 📊 In .NET, the built-in Stack<T> uses arrays under the hood for best average-case speed.

Personal tip: If you know your maximum stack size (like parsing a small expression), arrays are great. For unpredictable size or frequent changes, linked lists feel smoother.

🎯 Purpose & Use Case

  • ✅ Choose arrays when you want speed and can estimate or cap the maximum stack size up front.
  • ✅ Go with linked lists for stacks that grow or shrink without predictable limits—like in interpreters or when simulating recursion.
  • ✅ Both are used in undo-redo logic, backtracking algorithms, and expression evaluation—just pick the right tool for your scenario.

💻 Real Code Example

// Array-based stack implementation
public class ArrayStack
{
    private T[] items;
    private int top = -1;

    public ArrayStack(int size) { items = new T[size]; }

    public void Push(T item)
    {
        if (top == items.Length - 1) throw new Exception("Stack Overflow");
        items[++top] = item;
    }

    public T Pop()
    {
        if (top == -1) throw new Exception("Stack Underflow");
        return items[top--];
    }
}

// Linked list-based stack implementation
public class LinkedStack
{
    private class Node { public T Data; public Node Next; }
    private Node top;

    public void Push(T item) { top = new Node { Data = item, Next = top }; }

    public T Pop()
    {
        if (top == null) throw new Exception("Stack Underflow");
        T value = top.Data;
        top = top.Next;
        return value;
    }
}

❓ Interview Q&A

Q1: What is a stack in data structures?
A: It’s a LIFO (Last-In-First-Out) structure—think undo history or browser back button.

Q2: Why use an array for a stack?
A: For speed, tight memory use, and fast cache performance when max size is known.

Q3: When does a linked list stack make sense?
A: When stack size is unpredictable or grows/shrinks often.

Q4: Which is more memory efficient?
A: Arrays—no per-element pointer overhead.

Q5: What does “stack overflow” mean for array stacks?
A: Trying to add more items than the array’s capacity allows.

Q6: Are stack operations O(1) in both implementations?
A: Yes—for push and pop, unless array resizes are triggered.

Q7: Is stack traversal common?
A: It’s possible, but in real applications, stacks are rarely traversed—just pushed or popped.

Q8: Does .NET’s Stack<T> use arrays or linked lists?
A: Internally, it’s array-based for performance.

Q9: What’s the trade-off for linked list stacks?
A: Extra memory per node for pointers, and potential CPU cache misses.

Q10: How do you decide which to use?
A: Estimate your max size and performance needs—arrays for speed and predictability, linked lists for flexibility.

📝 MCQs

Q1. Which stack type grows naturally with new items?

  • Array stack
  • Linked list stack
  • HashSet
  • ArrayList

Q2. Which is best for tight memory use?

  • Array stack
  • Linked list stack
  • Queue
  • Deque

Q3. What is the typical time for push/pop?

  • O(1) in both
  • O(n)
  • O(log n)
  • O(1) in array only

Q4. What triggers resizing in array stacks?

  • Low memory
  • Exceeding capacity
  • Duplicate items
  • Type mismatch

Q5. Which stack has pointer overhead?

  • Array stack
  • Linked list stack
  • Both
  • Neither

Q6. Why are array stacks usually faster?

  • More memory
  • Better CPU cache locality
  • Linked nodes
  • Larger size

Q7. Which is better for unknown stack size?

  • Array stack
  • Linked list stack
  • Queue
  • ArrayList

Q8. What happens if you push to a full array stack?

  • Stack overflow
  • Stack underflow
  • Silent ignore
  • Automatic resize always

Q9. Is .NET's built-in Stack<T> array-based?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Optional
  • Depends on version

Q10. Which is preferred for undo/redo logic?

  • Array stack
  • Linked list stack
  • Either, depending on app
  • List<T>

💡 Bonus Insight

Most production code in .NET uses Stack<T>—fast, reliable, and battle-tested. But knowing the difference between array and linked list stacks can help you optimize for edge cases, pass interviews, and even debug memory issues nobody else can spot!

📄 PDF Download

Need a handy summary for your notes? Download this topic as a PDF!

Grab this comparison as a handy PDF for your next interview or code review!

💬 Feedback
🚀 Start Learning
Share:

Tags: